You
walk up to the man on the street and tell him that Jesus Christ loves
him and died so he could receive forgiveness of his sins. You explain
that everyone should obey Jesus because He is the Son of God. The man
wants to know how you know this information. You inform him that the
Bible, the inspired Word of God, declares it to be true. He wants to
know two things: (1) How can you prove that there is a God?; and (2) How
can you prove that the Bible is His Word? He is not being belligerent
or cantankerous; he simply wants some good evidence that would warrant
the total overhaul of his life you are asking him to make.
It
is now your responsibility to present solid, rational arguments that
prove the things you have affirmed. You must defend the propositions you
have presented. You are appointed for the defense of the Gospel
(Philippians 1:17, NKJV).
The term
"apologetics" derives from the Greek word apologia, which means "to
defend" or "to make a defense." Thus, apologetics is a discipline
dedicated to the defense of something. There can be as many different
types of apologetics as there are beliefs in the world: atheistic
apologetics, Hindu apologetics, Buddhist apologetics, Christian
apologetics, ad infinitum. However, generally when the discipline is
discussed, most people associate it with Christian apologetics.
Therefore, for the remainder of this discussion, when I use the term
apologetics, I will be referring specifically to Christian apologetics.
What is apologetics?
Christian
philosopher Dick Sztanyo has suggested: "Apologetics is the
proclamation and defense of the gospel of Christ regardless of whenever,
wherever, and by whomever it is challenged." The apostle Peter used
apologetics when he appealed to the empty tomb on Pentecost.
Paul used apologetics when he quoted the stoic poets to draw attention to God's existence as he addressed the Athenians.
Christ used apologetics when He appealed to a Roman coin to prove that Jews should pay taxes.
We
can see, then, that the word apologetics carries no hint of
"apologizing"—in the sense of being sorry or ashamed. On the contrary,
the word houses the exact opposite idea of intelligent vindication by
vigorous argument. In fact, Paul stated in 2 Corinthians 10:4-5: "For
the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling
down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that
exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into
captivity to the obedience of Christ." Apologetics vigorously defends
the truth by refuting arguments that exalt themselves above God's Word.
What tools, then, can apologetics use to "cast down" faulty arguments?
Its
toolbox is as endlessly deep as it is long. Any discipline—from
astronomy to zoology—can be called upon to come to the aid of
apologetics.
Just as Peter used the
physical evidence of the empty tomb, just as Paul used contemporary
literature, and jut as Jesus used an inscription on a coin, modern
apologists can use archaeology, literature, science, morality,
technology, and countless other facets of human life to defend
Christianity.
A small child can watch ants hard at work and testify to the wisdom of the book of Proverbs.
An astrophysicist can contemplate the Second Law of Thermodynamics and maintain that the world will not last forever.
An
archaeologist can find an ancient inscription about a people known as
the Hittites and assert that the Bible has accurate information about
this ancient group of people.
A
professor of literature can read poetry from ages past and ascertain
that mankind always has desired to worship a Creator Who is infinitely
higher than humanity.
From the
heights of the mountains to the depths of the oceans, facts surface that
provide an ample array of ammunition that can be fired from the cannon
of apologetics.
However, the
machinery of apologetics can operate only on the fuel of reason, for
without reason apologetics has no sure foundation.
The
Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary defines reason as "the power of
comprehending, inferring, or thinking, especially in orderly, rational
ways."
Paul contrasted reason with
insanity in Acts 26:24-25: "Now as he thus made his defense, Festus said
with a loud voice, 'Paul, you are beside yourself! Much learning is
driving you mad!' But he said, 'I am not mad, most noble Festus, but
speak the words of truth and reason.' "
God and His spokesmen always have spoken rational, reasonable truths.
God
employed reason to convince Isaiah's listeners of their sin: " 'Come
now, and let us reason together,' says the Lord, 'Though your sins are
like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow' " (Isaiah 1:18).
When
Samuel spoke to the Israelites at the coronation of Saul, he said: "Now
therefore, stand still, that I may reason with you before the Lord
concerning all the righteous acts of the Lord which He did to you and
your fathers" (1 Samuel 12:7).
From
the dawn of time, God presented man with the facts, and then allowed man
to use reason to reach correct conclusions. Thus, Romans 1:20 states:
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are
clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made…."
Reason
provides for the removal of all contradictory and fallacious arguments,
leaving only those facts that are consistent and correct.
The
Christian religion, at its core, is based upon historically verifiable
facts. The Bible is not a sourcebook of wise proverbs that somehow
stand upon their own merit. Without an establishment of the facts
concerning the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus, the Word of God
as we know it—even with all of its sound wisdom and practical
guidance—is nothing more than a devotional book full of helpful
platitudes that deserves to be placed on the shelf next to the Chicken
Soup for the Soul series. By using historical facts that are consistent
and correct, apologetics makes its defense by appealing to man's
capacity to reason.
God never has
desired that His human creatures blindly accept unreasonable
propositions postulated by perverse persons. He does not want us to be
"children, tossed to and fro and carried about with every wind of
doctrine, by the trickery of men, in the cunning craftiness by which
they lie in wait to deceive (Ephesians 4:14). On the contrary, He
demands that we "test all things; hold fast what is good" (2
Thessalonians 5:21).
In the end,
however, apologetics can soften only the hearts of those who agree to be
honest with themselves and to deal honestly and reasonably with the
available evidence. There is much truth in the old adage: "A man
convinced against his will is of the same opinion still."
What is counter-apologetics?
Counter-apologetics
is the term used to describe the process of providing rational
objections to arguments made by religious apologists. **While this
process could also be called 'apologetics' (based on the strict
definition), the terms 'apologetics' and 'apologist' have become
virtually synonymous with Christian (or religious) apologetics.**
This
redefinition carries implications about the burden of proof and
additional concerns that seem to demand that a different, yet similar,
term be used to describe objections to traditional religious
apologetics.
- Iron Chariots Wiki
http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Counter-apologetics
http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Counter-apologetics
Iron
Chariots is intended to provide information on apologetics and
counter-apologetics. We'll be collecting common arguments and providing
responses, information and resources to help counter the glut of
misinformation and poor arguments which masquerade as "evidence" for
religious claims.
The complexity of
issues surrounding religion ensures that any proper assessment requires
us to delve into a number of philosophical, historical and sociological
topics. Our ultimate goal is to provide a robust and definitive resource
for:
* atheists seeking responses to common apologetic arguments
* theists who are questioning the efficacy of their beliefs
* apologists who feel that their "pet" argument is above reproach
* individuals of any philosophical ideal who have an interest in religious studies
* atheists seeking responses to common apologetic arguments
* theists who are questioning the efficacy of their beliefs
* apologists who feel that their "pet" argument is above reproach
* individuals of any philosophical ideal who have an interest in religious studies
No comments:
Post a Comment